WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court wasted little time Monday making clear its reluctance to wade back into the national battle over gun rights.
After refusing to rule on a challenge to New York City gun restrictions because they were rescinded while the case was pending, the court turned away all potential replacements that would have given its conservative justices a chance to strengthen the Second Amendment.
The justices had a long list of challenges to choose from, including several testing the threshold issue of whether guns can be carried in public nationwide, as they currently are in some 40 states. Other issues included bans on assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, and handgun sales.
By refusing to take a new case so quickly after declaring the New York City case moot, the justices denied gun-rights groups such as the National Rifle Association what they have been seeking – an opportunity to put state and local limits before an increasingly conservative court.
Earlier: Supreme Court's conservatives appear poised to expand Second Amendment gun rights
Associate Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh dissented from the decision not to hear a major New Jersey case testing the right to carry guns in public.
"In several jurisdictions throughout the country, law-abiding citizens have been barred from exercising the fundamental right to bear arms because they cannot show that they have a 'justifiable need' or 'good reason' for doing so," Thomas wrote. "One would think that such an onerous burden on a fundamental right would warrant this court’s review."
Three of the court's conservatives dissented in April when it declared the New York case moot, rather than striking down transportation restrictions on legally owned guns taken beyond city limits. But Kavanaugh, a fourth conservative, made clear his desire to engage on the Second Amendment.
"The court should address that issue soon, perhaps in one of the several Second Amendment cases with petitions for certiorari now pending before the court," he wrote then.
Since its 2008 and 2010 rulings striking down gun restrictions in the District of Columbia and Chicago, the court has refused to hear dozens of cases challenging lesser limits on who can own what types of guns, where they can be taken, what requirements must be met and more. During that time, lower courts have resolved more than 1,000 Second Amendment cases, upholding many gun control measures.
If conservatives have their way eventually, the court could extend Second Amendment rights beyond the home, or at least require that lower court judges demand more specific justifications for state and local restrictions.
When the justices agreed to hear the New York challenge 15 months ago, gun-control groups feared they would use it to do just that. So they lobbied the city and state to retreat, ultimately convincing the court to declare the case closed.
More: Supreme Court sidesteps major Second Amendment case, a setback for NRA
That didn't sit well with Thomas and Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch.
"By incorrectly dismissing this case as moot, the court permits our docket to be manipulated in a way that should not be countenanced," Alito wrote for the trio in April. "If a case is on our docket and we have jurisdiction, we have an obligation to decide it."
"hear" - Google News
June 15, 2020 at 09:03PM
https://ift.tt/3e9oK3K
Supreme Court refuses to hear new challenge to gun restrictions - USA TODAY
"hear" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2KTiH6k
https://ift.tt/2Wh3f9n
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Supreme Court refuses to hear new challenge to gun restrictions - USA TODAY"
Post a Comment